|
Edited by off41 at 2017-10-13 10:24 \n\n
Yes, I agree with you on the fact that Xiaomi has a much larger firepower than UMI. But this does not in any way justify the fact that UMI drops the software evolution on "old" phones (when it is possible of course to continue to have soft evolutions) ..... , and on the UMI Super among others it is possible to have and to do.
It seems to me this is especially true as the android versions are mainly from the official ROM basic without any specific overlay (or so little).
On the other hand, you talk about price / power comparison. I did not want to go into this comparative but let's go (although I consider that, overall, UMI Super is a good phone):
- Xiaomi 156 €, UMI 198 €
- antutu score actually tested: Xiaomi about 74000, UMI about 49000
- Photo quality better on the Xiaomi than on the UMI, certainly also related to the photo application
- Number of 4G bands supported much more important on the Xiaomi whose 700Mhz for France
- better battery life than the UMI for a lower capacity
- ... I stop there, but there are others things to say ...
UMI can not play on performance, it is related to the harware, but could easily do the necessary to improve some things by continuing to follow the software evolution of android and correcting the bugs or imperfections that remain.
To complete my purpose, when I can see that a 2015's phone is going to receive Oreo it leaves me ... how can I say ... "pensive" (and I weigh my words) that UMI does not makes any effort to at least provide the source code to allow people of good will to make evolve the actual ROM stock ...
see here : http://www.gizchina.com/2017/10/12/2015s-jiayu-s3-may-receive-oreo-soon-courtesy-mad-team/
For me that's it that's all
|
|