|
I decided I'd seen enough of the S2 Pro and sent it back to GearBest for a full refund - it wasn't fit for purpose. GearBest, to be honest, were absolutely brilliant in the speed and manner of processing my request...I only had to return the phone to a UK address too!
Terrible Bluetooth signal aside, I wasn't happy with the speed or quality of the camera. If that was a Sony optic then I'm a monkey's uncle! Very poor pictures and horrendously slow to capture. As to why Umdigi felt the need to put one fake lens on the rear of the camera then I will never know. Truly ridiculous, infantile marketing ploy.
Waterproof? Rubbish. It's as splash-proof as any other smartphone, but that's it...hence the reason why the warranty doesn't cover any water damage to the internals. More than a marketing ploy; it's an advertising scam that I doubt would be allowed by the ASA here in the UK.
Given that the screen is, allegedly, a piece of kit manufactured by Sharp, then that's a disappointment too. Poor viewing angles and not really that bright...then again, after a Samsung Super Amoled screen, everything else looks a bit flat and dull. I've gone back to a second hand Samsung Galaxy S5...it's a quarter of the price of the Umdigi S2 Pro, yet twice the phone in so many ways. It's lighter, brighter, faster, better camera, IP67 water resistant with a camera that knocks spots off the S2 Pro.
Sorry for the negativity to you owners out there, but I'm being honest and factual. However, judging by the number of 'New - other' Umdigi S2 Pros being offered for sale on eBay, many other buyers have drawn similar conclusions to myself. After the glowing 'independent reviews' from bloggers and other online marketeers, it would appear that these same authors have been 'incentivised' to lavish such praise. Why else would they be so complimentary about a 'flagship killer' which, I'm afraid to say, this phone is certainly not? |
|