UMI Super Android 7.0 beta V7.01_20170114

bencebacsi

GrAlNik replied at 2017-1-22 23:55

Something is not correct with your charging system since at 60% of battery level the charging current should be above 0.9A.

Andrew87

Makaveli replied at 2017-1-23 16:51
In regards of battery life: When you change the firmware you need more than one charge cycle for t ...

I did not know that. Thanks for the tip!

Makaveli

Andrew87 replied at 2017-1-23 19:50
I did not know that. Thanks for the tip!

Now i get a solid 9 hours SOT. Which is about two hours more than i had on the Marshmallow stock ROM. As you can see in the SS i've already hit the 5 hour mark on SOT with 51% left. I've hammered this battery like the true heavy user i am to really test the limits.

GrAlNik

bencebacsi replied at 2017-1-23 19:31
Something is not correct with your charging system since at 60% of battery level the charging curr ...

Where the Photo with true PE+ on v.7.01_20170114?

bigfootaus

Well great. I bought my UMI Super because it was the cheap, super-powerful Pokemon GO machine. And now Pokemon GO has updated and doesn't like the UMI Super any more.

I could tolerate this sort of thing with the Opal Travel app (Sydney public transport) since I figure one app being extremely paranoid about unofficial Android phones was rare, but that's it. Please, PLEASE make sure the UMI Super works with Pokemon Go and other apps that dislike rooted phones.

I haven't even rooted or flashed my phone - I specifically avoided testing the Nougat beta so I could play Pokemon GO a little longer just in case I screwed up the upgrade and angered the security-paranoid apps - but wow. I've done everything right and not touched any rooting or flashing software or beta upgrades, and I still get screwed over because the UMI ROMs aren't secure.

Like another user said in another thread:

Please tell the development team to sign the ROM using release keys before shipping the final! More and more (it seems) "critical" apps (like banking apps, and some versions of the Wear Companion app) seems to check this, and refuse to run, rejecting the device as "tampered with" if it's signed with test keys.

bencebacsi

bigfootaus replied at 2017-1-24 11:47
Well great. I bought my UMI Super because it was the cheap, super-powerful Pokemon GO machine. And n ...

Hi,
If you've really had never flashed your phone, you'd have been on V3.02_20161017 version now and Pokémon Go could run properly.

bigfootaus

\n\nHi bencebacsi,

Please watch this recording I just made showing that I am on that version of the ROM and that Pokemon GO does not work. This is Pokemon GO version 0.53.2 - the latest available on the Google Play Store / the update released on the 23rd of January.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxyfsy18ioU
If you'd like any more information to help verify this, please let me know. I'm not making these posts to troll anyone or waste peoples' time, I'm making these posts because I have an issue that I believe can be fixed by you and the UMI engineers.

Clearly, if other users are having this issue (such as Mats, who I quoted my prior post), it's probably worth looking into. I'll cooperate with whatever info you need me to provide for this. I really want this to be fixed in future ROMs!!!
Edit: Can anyone on the beta ROMs confirm if Pokemon GO or any other security-paranoid apps still work? Personal experience on the last Android 6 OTA ROM says Opal Travel and Pokemon GO don't work, not sure what else doesn't work too.

BC66

bigfootaus replied at 2017-1-24 16:58
Edited by bigfootaus at 2017-1-24 17:10 \n\nHi bencebacsi,

Please watch this recording I just made ...

I installed Pokemon Go on Nougat Beta2 and it is working fine. I installed Opal travel and it is running fine on Nougat Beta2 too (I did not setup a payment). Hope this helps.

bigfootaus

BC66 replied at 2017-1-24 17:21
I installed Pokemon Go on Nougat Beta2 and it is working fine. I installed Opal travel and it is r ...

That is actually really helpful, thankyou BC66! I'll wait and see what bencebacsi says but I'm starting to think applying the beta rom might be a good idea after all...

LeXuZ

bigfootaus replied at 2017-1-24 16:58
Edited by bigfootaus at 2017-1-24 17:10 \n\nHi bencebacsi,

Please watch this recording I just made ...

I think that if you have secured boot.OMG the problem is solved isn't it? I've seen itsomewhere here in the forum (or was it xda?) please wait until someone gives confirmation on this.