|
Perhaps I am the only one who views this as a problem. If so, my apologies. This latest news that UMI is posed to release an "extreme" version of its Plus phone is supposed to make us giddy with anticipation. Instead, it just compounds an issue I have noticed of late. Doing a quick search on Google I've found out that UMI has released (so far) 4 cell phones this year: Touch, Super, Max, and Plus (not counting the London variant). I think it's fair to say that the Plus Extreme will probably launch sometime before the end of 2016, bringing the total to 5 "different" cell phones. Unfortunately, they're not all that different, neither in price nor specifications. Rather, it appears as UMI has been upgrading their template with each release, much like Apple does when it releases the iPhone 6 one year, only to release the "slightly upgraded" 6s version the next. As far as I know, Samsung has yet to jump on that particular wagon and has instead opted for releasing its S and S Edge series together on any given year but let's stick to Apple for this example. Their strategy is sound: release 1 premium phone per year or every 2 years. In this way, you're not only able to offer support for your product but, more importantly, it shows you're confident your product will stand the test of time for the next year or so. Imagine if Apple were to release the iPhone 6, 6s, 6t, and 6u, on the same year but spaced over a few months. People would riot, believing Apple was taking them for fools. With 4 different versions of the same phone now, odds are some people who would've otherwise bought an iPhone decide not to.
This is my fear with UMI's continuous string of releases. To my mind, it only serves to further damage their relationship with customers as support for previous models is dropped in lieu of newer ones, and not even a year has passed on these previous models! The relatively similar characteristics and price points hint at an inherent lack of organization and a distorted view of how marketing works. After all, there are only so many times you can announce a new product that's not particularly new before your consumer base tires. Indeed, people are slowly becoming disenchanted with Apple's own "s" upgrades. My suggestion? Do some benchmarking, look at Samsung and Apple, decide on a small release lineup for a given year, market different phones with (markedly) different characteristics and price points, and offer regular support for them for at least a year, maybe two. Be aware of your weaknesses: if your engineering team is small you will not be able to support a wide range of products so narrow your range to begin with. Doing otherwise will not only frustrate your customers but your staff as well.
I hope this advice is useful to you and that we'll see a renewed UMI in 2017.
|
|